Elaborated in a cultural context in which a new conception of epidemics (also conditioned by the phenomena of imperialism and colonialism) is taking shape, Jack London’s reflections in 'The Unparalleled Invasion' (1910), 'The Scarlet Plague' (1915) and 'The Human Drift' (1917) bring to the forefront correlations between scientific progress and social transformations, between alteration and recomposition of the political order, and between man and nature. At the same time, London’s attribution of primacy to the relentless struggle for biological survival to which every living form is subjected and his acknowledgement of the ephemeral nature of human existence, allow us to rethink the dynamics of pandemic conjunctures also in the light of the comparison with the most recent medical and anthropological scientific studies.
Elaborate in un contesto culturale in cui prende forma una nuova concezione delle epidemie (condizionata anche dai fenomeni dell’imperialismo e del colonialismo), le riflessioni di Jack London in 'The Unparalleled Invasion' (1910), 'The Scarlet Plague' (1915) e 'The Human Drift' (1917) portano in primo piano le correlazioni tra progresso scientifico e trasformazioni sociali, tra alterazione e ricomposizione dell’ordine politico, tra uomo e natura. Al tempo stesso, il primato attribuito da London all’incessante lotta di sopravvivenza biologica a cui è assoggettata ogni forma vivente e la correlata presa d’atto del carattere effimero dell’esistenza umana, consentono di ripensare le dinamiche delle congiunture pandemiche anche alla luce del confronto con i più recenti studi medici e antropologici.
Crisi epidemiche e attesa della fine: la lotta per la sopravvivenza in Jack London
Angelo Arciero
2024-01-01
Abstract
Elaborated in a cultural context in which a new conception of epidemics (also conditioned by the phenomena of imperialism and colonialism) is taking shape, Jack London’s reflections in 'The Unparalleled Invasion' (1910), 'The Scarlet Plague' (1915) and 'The Human Drift' (1917) bring to the forefront correlations between scientific progress and social transformations, between alteration and recomposition of the political order, and between man and nature. At the same time, London’s attribution of primacy to the relentless struggle for biological survival to which every living form is subjected and his acknowledgement of the ephemeral nature of human existence, allow us to rethink the dynamics of pandemic conjunctures also in the light of the comparison with the most recent medical and anthropological scientific studies.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.