This paper analyzes the different processes to regulate the EU and US banking markets in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007-2009. The declination of the capital adequacy requirements in Europe shows the difficulties of small banks in complying with the new rules set by the third Basel agreement, even if small banks have a competitive advantage in offering financing to the small enterprises. In conclusion, the Author shows that the EU regulation introduces certain constraints that are not useful to foster financial stability and to level the playing field.

REGOLE E SUPERVISIONE DELLE BANCHE: APPROCCIO UNITARIO VS MODELLO PER LIVELLI E IMPLICAZIONI PER LA MORFOLOGIA DEL SISTEMA DELLE BANCHE, EU E US (Rules and supervision of banks: “one-size-fits-all” vs “tiered approach” in the banking industry, EU and US)

Masera R
2015-01-01

Abstract

This paper analyzes the different processes to regulate the EU and US banking markets in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007-2009. The declination of the capital adequacy requirements in Europe shows the difficulties of small banks in complying with the new rules set by the third Basel agreement, even if small banks have a competitive advantage in offering financing to the small enterprises. In conclusion, the Author shows that the EU regulation introduces certain constraints that are not useful to foster financial stability and to level the playing field.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14241/9239
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact